Real America’s Voice

… its pool coverage available to them.

This is the next chapter for Real America’s Voice — powered by a team that never stops and the viewers who make it possible.

We are Real America’s Voice — and we’re proud of it. 🇺🇸

… legacy media to block out the American people from Trump's trip to the UN.

This is the start of a media REVOLUTION! 🔥

… coverage of ALL of POTUS' events tomorrow, courtesy of RAV.

The video you're seeing here is from RAV'S OWN CAMERAS. MUCH better than what we normally get from CNN's cameras.

… “Competition is always good.”

Now RAV is putting that idea into action — providing a clean pool feed and making it available to media organizations that request access.
No comments:

She’s Got a “Trump” Addiction

All of the SLEAZEBAGS, like Third Rate “Reporter,” Kaitlan Collins, of Fake News CNN, a truly unhappy person, said they weren’t going to be covering me. Then why were they ranting and raving like Lunatics, in the Press Area, at the United Nations? Why was she there? She’s got a “TRUMP” addiction, and so does CNN and MSDNC. They’re all sick, treasonous, and demented! The “good news” is that they have a great, for them, and totally disloyal Judge.

Donald J Trump

No comments:

Trump Tower, 22 September 2026

No comments:

Karoline Leavitt, 22 September 2026



… ignores what the president actually did.

"They believe they are the arbiters of the truth and doing the country a great service, but they are clearly slanted and biased against the president. I’ve seen it so many times. This is how fake news is manufactured.

A hack journalist comes up with a narrative on their own that they think is true about the president or the White House.

They love the palace-intrigue stories: this person is fighting with that person. About 90% of my job was batting down fake stuff.

They will go find a source who has no idea what they’re talking about, was not in the room, doesn’t even work at the White House — maybe worked on the campaign as a volunteer staffer for one day.

Then they say, “A source close to President Trump told us this.” Who’s your source? Because I was in the room. I’m a better source than them, and I’m telling you this did not happen.

They’ll still write it. All they need is two sources: one to say that happened, another they call who says, “Yeah, that probably sounds right.” Then the story is written.

You can have the White House aggressively on the record pushing back, and they’ll still print it. It’ll be on the front page of the paper the next day. That’s how things get written. They just seek a bad narrative and they’ll find anyone who helps them push that narrative.

The other thing — the bias of omission is the most dangerous. You can see I get all fired up about this stuff. What you don’t see in the news. I watched CNN when I was in my job. I watched it all day, every day. I had to know what the opponent was saying. I had to be prepared.

The president would sign amazing executive orders or give great speeches that they don’t even cover.

They don’t even mention that the President of the United States did this or that on any given day. Don’t you think your audience deserves to know what their president is doing? They don’t think so.

I’ve gotten on the phone with the leadership of all those stations and said, “Why are you not taking the president’s remarks live? Just let your audience decide how they feel about this.” “Oh well, we have more important things to cover today.”"
No comments:

President Trump Participates in a Shield of the Americas Event

No comments:

CNN Continues Distorting It’s Reporting

Blitzer claims that CNN is barred from "coving the president of the United States.” Actually, CNN is barred from the White House not from covering the president.

No comments:

We Want Everybody to Hear the President Unfiltered

… remarks unfiltered for viewers.
No comments:

Cracking Down on Illegal Robocalls & Text

👇 Chairman, Federal Communications Commission. fcc.gov/blockit
No comments:

She Spent $1.5 Million of Her Own Money to Restore the White House

… peeling from the walls. Historic furniture was damaged and unusable. Carpets were stained and badly worn. Some windows weren’t even closing properly. The “People’s House” looked neglected. So Melania did something extraordinary: She reportedly spent $1.5 MILLION of her OWN money to help restore it. Not taxpayer money. Not government funding. Her personal money. From her own account. To help preserve one of America’s most historic homes.

Then the media attacked her for “wasting taxpayer money” — even though the claim was that she had not used a single taxpayer dollar. Here’s the truth about Melania’s generosity that many people never heard. 😭🏛️ Let me show you what Melania actually did:

2017. Melania moves into the White House. The private residence had reportedly not been properly maintained for years. She walks through rooms that should represent American excellence and sees deterioration around her. Most First Ladies might have expected the government to cover the renovations. Melania reportedly reached for her own checkbook.

$1.5 million. Personal funds. To restore:
∙ Historic furniture dating back to the Kennedy era
∙ Priceless paintings and artwork
∙ Carpets throughout the State Rooms
∙ Window treatments that were falling apart
∙ Paint on walls that was peeling and cracked

She approached the White House restoration the way you would care for your own home — with attention, respect, and her own money.

Here’s what makes this so heartbreaking: While Melania was reportedly using her personal fortune to help preserve America’s home, the media was publishing stories accusing her of “lavish renovations at taxpayer expense.”

They were wrong. Completely. The claim was that every dollar came from Melania’s personal account. She could have expected taxpayers to cover the work. Instead, she reportedly chose to pay herself because she believed preserving the White House was worth her personal sacrifice.

Think about what that means. Most people wouldn’t spend $1,500 fixing someone else’s house. Melania reportedly spent $1.5 MILLION helping restore America’s house. She didn’t have to. The government could have covered the costs. But she chose generosity over convenience because she understood that the White House belongs to every American. It deserves to be beautiful. And she had the means to help make it beautiful without costing taxpayers a cent.

And what did she get in return? Media criticism accusing her of wasting “taxpayer money” that she reportedly never used.

SHARE this everywhere because Americans deserve to hear the story of Melania helping preserve their historic home with HER money, not theirs. Tag someone who has ever been criticized for being generous and tell them:

“The truth always matters more than the narrative. Your generosity was never wasted.” 🏛️💔
No comments:

Tthe Joint Warfighter Evaluation

… having a sponsor who sits on the promotion board matters, greatly.

That's how we get politicized generals who support racist, anti-American nonsense like DEI.

This is a great, great step in replacing politics with merit at our senior ranks.

This is what a revolution in military personnel affairs looks like.

Lara Logan


This will elevate the ranks of military leaders at the top. No doubt the detractors will bitch & moan but you have to ask yourself, why would you not want rigorous standards for your General Officers & Navy Captains? Is it because you are content to see the U.S. military slide into mediocrity? Or is it because you are part of the political machine that has been systematically whittling away the advantages the U.S. military has over America’s enemies through the policy of “over-match” which under Biden’s autopen administration was downgraded to “parity”.

I am not making this up: it comes from a U.S. military General who was told directly that the policy for U.S. forces in space was no longer er “over-match” - it was “parity” & there were multiple orders that I cannot disclose publicly that went along with ensuring that outcome. That is real.

So is the fact that we left behind over $80 billion dollars of military equipment in the hands of terrorists in Afghanistan, including sensitive technology that had given U.S. forces a significant advantage on the battlefield - ie: over-match. Why would anyone do that when there was no one forcing them to do so? No reason to pull out in chaos & adhere to a timeline set by terrorists you could have crushed overnight if you had used a fraction of your advanced military capability? We are facing Americans, leaders within our own country, who have been actively degrading the American military and reducing our advantages on the battlefield as a matter of policy. Not an accident, not a mistake. Intentional.
No comments: