Surrounding Canada

No comments:

Broadcasting from the Sidewalks, Saturday, 19 September 2026

No comments:

Maybe People Should Just Stop Believing What The Washington Post Has to Say

… Washington Post has to say. That’d be a nice place to start."

"It’s always anonymous sources with those jokers. The Washington Post doesn’t have any credibility and hasn’t had any for a very long time. I meant what I said. They hate the president more than they love the country. That’s why we called him out as the fake news. He’s been right from the beginning.

We never would, because of how much we cherish the lives of our service members — every single one of them.

Even if we wanted to attempt to hide a combat death, we never would, and we never could. We just wouldn’t. It’s not something the United States of America does.

It’s totally made up. It’s fake. It’s a lie. It’s a headline they want to try to make us look bad, the president look bad, and try to undermine the historic success that we’ve had in that conflict. It’s a joke. It should be dismissed as such, and it’s unfortunate that that’s what so-called journalism has to say."
No comments:

Logan & Jake Paul

No comments:

The Future

No comments:

This Is a Poll

Many people think that the words “Artificial Intelligence” are inaccurate, and very ineloquent, relative to AI, or Artificial Intelligence. A far more elegant and accurate description of this new phenomena would be Superior Intelligence (SI) or, Extreme Intelligence (EI) or, Supreme Intelligence (SI). This is a Poll, and I would appreciate everybody voting! Which is the best name for this ever growing “Revolution?”

“Supreme Intelligence,” probably because of its relationship to the Supreme Court, is losing badly to both “Superior” and “Extreme Intelligence.” Therefore, we are going to take “Supreme Intelligence” OUT, deleting it as a qualifier, and let you vote for the Final Two: Superior Intelligence, or Extreme Intelligence. A fresh Vote begins now!

Donald J Trump
No comments:

A Top Grade Military Complex/Triumphal Arch

At the strong request of the United States Military, and for National Security purposes, I have agreed to convert the magnificent Triumphal Arch, planned since the Civil War Era many years ago, at the Receptive Circle adjoining the Arlington Memorial Bridge, into a top grade Military Complex/Triumphal Arch, to house, store, and have the rapid ability to use large numbers of drones, plus Snipers, on both the roof and plaza areas, and additionally have and hold large quantities of sniper ammunition in storage. There will be no facility like this anywhere in the World. Out of the 59 top cities and Capitals, Washington, D.C., IS THE ONLY ONE IN THE WORLD THAT DOES NOT HAVE A TRIUMPHAL ARCH, but it will now and, by far, the greatest of them all!

Donald J Trump


Dr Robert Malone

This isn't just Trump talking.

Trump has already survived three documented assassination attempts. Federal prosecutors have also convicted an Iranian IRGC operative in a murder-for-hire plot that DOJ says included plans to assassinate Trump. And U.S. officials have received additional warnings concerning Iranian threats against him and his family.

Meanwhile, the U.S. military and DHS have been treating drones, including increasingly autonomous systems, as a serious homeland-security threat.

So put the pieces together: a President who has already been shot at, another would-be assassin positioned with a rifle near his golf course, documented Iranian assassination plotting, and rapidly advancing autonomous-drone technology.

The location itself makes strategic sense. The proposed arch would sit at Memorial Circle, at the Virginia end of Arlington Memorial Bridge, giving an elevated position with unusually open sight lines over the Potomac and the western approach to the Lincoln Memorial, National Mall, and central Washington.

For counter-drone surveillance, detection and interception, that geography is hardly arbitrary. The need to harden the White House and Washington against drone and sniper attacks is not imaginary. The threat environment is real.
No comments:

‘Modest Fashion Week’,



Robby Starbuck

Understand that they could have had this hijab niqab fashion show anywhere, but they chose to have it at the Church of England. The people behind this seek to conquer, not to assimilate. And you know what? I don’t blame them. I blame the weak people who’ve allowed it to happen.
No comments:

Return Home, It’s Not Too Late

No comments:

How Many More Will Be Told This Is “Care”

… A total 2,083 individuals were studied, with 16,643 matched controls. They were followed for up to 25 years.

Finland's health registers are mandatory, which means no one opts out — this is the complete national picture.

The numbers: psychiatric morbidity rose from 9.8% to 60.7% in adolescents who underwent feminising reassignment, and from 21.6% to 54.5% in masculinising reassignment.

Even after adjusting for prior psychiatric history, gender-referred adolescents faced five times the risk of male population controls, and three times the risk of female controls.

"Psychiatric needs do not subside after medical gender reassignment," the authors concluded.

Referrals after 2010 arrived sicker. 47.9% had already needed psychiatric treatment before their first clinic visit, against 15.3% among controls.

The authors' read: for some adolescents, gender distress may be secondary to other mental health challenges.

The evidence keeps mounting. The silencing continues anyway.

How many more adolescents will be told this is "care"?
No comments: