That is correct. This was a mad vote grab because so many Republicans turned out - they had to inflate the number of voters massively on the Democrat side & ended up with an improbable number. Obvious to anyone other than the willfully blind. They also had ridiculous results where people voted less for the most important/powerful positions than the ones down ballot. It defies belief because it is not real. It is engineered - ie: stolen.
Our election system has been captured. All that remains to be seen is if those in power allow this to continue & if the wethepeople do nothing.
Lara Logan
This represents 9-11% chaotic ticket splitting which is not normal by any stretch of the imagination. People suggesting that is are basically saying that Republicans all over the country used their ballot as a suicide note, party speaking.
Our election system has been captured. All that remains to be seen is if those in power allow this to continue & if the wethepeople do nothing.
Lara Logan
… Senate Races, sometimes for the Governor races, and here it shows in the SoS, who in my analysis was the sole target in Nevada.In Nevada, Jim Marchant (Republican running for SoS) received 52,266 less votes than the Republican Governor candidate. Marchant's Democrat opponent, Kennedy, received 50,949 more votes than the Democrat Governor candidate. This happened all over the country, usually for the Senate Races, sometimes for the Governor races, and here it shows in the SoS, who in my analysis was the sole target in Nevada. This represents 9-11% chaotic ticket splitting which is not normal by any stretch of the imagination. People suggesting that is are basically saying that Republicans all over the country used their ballot as a suicide note, party speaking.
— The Lone Raccoon (@FSociety_1942) November 7, 2026
This represents 9-11% chaotic ticket splitting which is not normal by any stretch of the imagination. People suggesting that is are basically saying that Republicans all over the country used their ballot as a suicide note, party speaking.
No comments:
Post a Comment