This is the kind of corruption that true scientists are up against. The numbers are stacked against us.
Doing real science, means papers get rejected, which means fewer papers- so grants and contract proposals get rejected.
Great scientists are run out, while those who cheat and make-up data to fit the narrative get promoted.
Dr Robert Malone
Desk rejection from a pre-print platform is extremely rare! It happened only when there are serious doubts about the underlying data or the credentials of the authors. VSAFE data is publicly available and I guess MIT has some credentials… So what the reason for this rare rejection can be???
These policies are common across scientific journals. Most of these journals and the scholar on their editorial boards are funded by self-interest pharmaceutical companies! This put the notion of peer-reviewed journals into serious question!
Doing real science, means papers get rejected, which means fewer papers- so grants and contract proposals get rejected.
Great scientists are run out, while those who cheat and make-up data to fit the narrative get promoted.
Dr Robert Malone
… a journal is done with no review asserting that the study’ topic is not important to the readership! Let it sink- the editors of Vaccine think that patient reporting on prolonged adverse health effects post vaccination is not an important topic! They published numerous CDC papers on VSAFE data, but rejected this paper with no review! What could be the reason for that?We must counter the immense censorship by scientific journals on any discussion of vaccine injuries!
— Retsef Levi (@RetsefL) September 2, 2026
Our recent preprint:
“Reporting on Prolonged Adverse Health Impact Among V-SAFE Enrollees”
was desk rejected from the journal Vaccine and @medrxivpreprint!
Desk rejection from…
Desk rejection from a pre-print platform is extremely rare! It happened only when there are serious doubts about the underlying data or the credentials of the authors. VSAFE data is publicly available and I guess MIT has some credentials… So what the reason for this rare rejection can be???
These policies are common across scientific journals. Most of these journals and the scholar on their editorial boards are funded by self-interest pharmaceutical companies! This put the notion of peer-reviewed journals into serious question!
No comments:
Post a Comment