Senator Darline Graham, 29 September 2026

Jack Smith didn’t have an answer for me when I asked him how he thought my brother Lindsey or anyone else was going to destroy evidence not in their possession.

You know why? It’s because Jack Smith was trying to bully allies of President Trump — and he weaponized our legal…

— Darline Graham (@DarlineGrahamSC) September 29, 2026

… system to do it.

The legal term for Jack Smith’s behavior would be obstruction of justice. But in South Carolina, we just call it a lie.

I enjoyed watching Darline Graham rip Jack Smith a new one for subpoenaing her late brother's cell records and adding a gag order to the subpoena.

Smith, of course, is lying about the nature of the nondisclosure orders added to dozens of subpoenas for lawmakers' records--which… pic.twitter.com/O5o2Rwsm7H

— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) September 29, 2026

… prohibited cell providers from notifying their customers about the subpoenas.

He has repeatedly claimed that he sought NDOs because Donald Trump, not the target of the subpoena, would tamper with evidence, obstruct the investigation, or threaten a witness--which he argued in the J6 case, citing Trump's tweet about Mark Milley committing treason. (This was part of the basis of his gag order on the president, approved by Judge Chutkan.)

But that is NOT the context of the requirements under the Stored Communications Act. The requirements pertain to the subject of the subpoena, not anyone in that person's universe.

Here is the NDO that Judge Boasberg signed for Smith's subpoena on Kevin McCarthy's records.