SCOTUS 6–3 Decision on Racial Gerrymandering

pic.twitter.com/g4elVvxLad

— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) April 29, 2026

This is YUUUGE!!! Big day in constitutional law. VRA remains intact, but to protect Americans AGAINST discrimination rather than requiring it to engineer racial outcomes. So proud of the @CivilRights team who pushed this amicus forward with our incredible SG colleagues. https://t.co/ZSle6qmH0r

— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@HarmeetKDhillon) April 29, 2026

🚨 In a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court strikes down Louisiana's new congressional map that added a second majority-black district, holding that it constitutes a racial gerrymander.

The Court narrows its previous interpretation of the Voting Rights Act. pic.twitter.com/rqy3POxauJ

— SCOTUS Wire (@scotus_wire) April 29, 2026

Representative Josh Williams

I'm a black Republican who currently represents a majority-white district in the Ohio State House and is running to represent a majority-white district in Congress.

The idea that black Americans need special districts carved out just for them is complete nonsense. It's a violation of the law and blatantly unconstitutional.

Glad the Supreme Court made the right decision.

NEW: SCOTUS Justice Clarence Thomas issues a separate concurrence agreeing with the majority 6-3 decision on racial gerrymandering, but says he would have gone further:

“Today’s decision should largely put an end to this “disastrous misadventure” in voting-rights jurisprudence.…

— Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) April 29, 2026

… As I explained more than 30 years ago, I would go further and hold that §2 of the Voting Rights Act does not regulate districting at all. The relevant text prohibits States from imposing or applying a “voting qualification,” “prerequisite to voting,” or “standard, practice, or procedure,” in a manner that results in a denial or abridgement of the right to vote based on race. 52 U. S. C. §10301(a). How States draw district lines does not fall within any of those three categories. The words in §2 instead “reach only ‘enactments that regulate citizens’ access to the ballot or the processes for counting a ballot’; they ‘do not include a State’s . . . choice of one districting scheme over another.’” Therefore, no §2 challenge to districting should ever succeed.”