… would have reacted the same if Melania Trump had endorsed the kidnapping and torture of children.It’s the classic media playbook: Mamdani claims his wife is a private person and they all nod along as if that ends the discussion. She posted these views publicly, so they were never private, and she lives with the officeholder, shaping his daily life and judgment. Doubtful they… https://t.co/3ybA9fAVuC
— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) March 8, 2026
… including whether she was mentioned publicly, involved behind the scenes, or helped shape the candidate’s path to office. She presumably also lives in Gracie Mansion, which is government-funded housing. She shares daily life with the officeholder, further raising questions about his judgment, support for extremism, and willingness to enable dangerous ideologies. Of course, in Mamdani’s case we already know the answers to these questions, but I am laying them out here as a general framework for how such situations should be evaluated.Even as a private citizen, a politician’s wife cannot escape scrutiny when she openly promotes fanatical extremist views. The spouse may have played a role, direct or indirect, in the politician’s rise, and we would need to examine the entire campaign to assess her influence,… https://t.co/7HVBNyFEB9
— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) March 7, 2026
No comments:
Post a Comment