… The American public expects prosecutors to prove cases and defendants to challenge them. But in United States v. James B. Comey Jr., something very different occurred. A federal grand jury voted to indict the former FBI Director on two felony counts — and then three federal judges unraveled that indictment through conjecture, media narratives, personalized attacks on the United States Attorney, and procedural anomalies that have no precedent in federal criminal practice.Outstanding summary by @CaraCastronuova on the judicial sabotage of the Comey indictment. Now can add Judge Kollar Kotelly to the mix after she ordered the return of Dan Richman’s files seized from his computer during Arctic Haze investigation: https://t.co/OR9Eaf2BWp
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) December 13, 2025
Together, they reveal a pattern inconsistent with judicial neutrality, ethical obligations, and the constitutional role of the grand jury.
Continue reading …
No comments:
Post a Comment