https://t.co/op5s4ZikGJ is fully open source, so anyone can use it for anything at no cost
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 28, 2025
https://t.co/op5s4ZiSwh version 0.1 is now live.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 28, 2025
Version 1.0 will be 10X better, but even at 0.1 it’s better than Wikipedia imo.
I just read the current grokipedia article on the Great Barrington Declaration. It's balanced & almost entirely factually accurate (though it still has me as Stanford prof.). Wikipedia, by contrast, is biased, bordering on libelous. Thank you @elonmusk!https://t.co/KF8mocCMrn
— Jay Bhattacharya (@DrJBhattacharya) October 28, 2025
The goal of Grok and https://t.co/op5s4ZikGJ is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 28, 2025
We will never be perfect, but we shall nonetheless strive towards that goal. https://t.co/j8bJf7c4Hl
Wikipedia vs. Grokipedia
— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) October 27, 2025
Wikipedia smears RFK Jr as a “conspiracy theorist and anti-vaccine activist” in the first sentence, while Grokipedia sticks to the facts.
I’m switching to Grokipedia 👍 pic.twitter.com/OvumKlvjQW
… again. Grokipedia is clearly much more factual and unbiased, and easier to read source documents.Wikipedia: "conspiracy theorists claim COVID-19 leaked from a lab"
— Arthur MacWaters (@ArthurMacwaters) October 28, 2025
Grokipedia: "experts are split, here are the sources for the house report on the lab leak and the scientific sentiment studies"
Wow! I'm genuinely incredibly impressed.
I will literally never use Wikipedia… https://t.co/whZrKozI25 pic.twitter.com/xD2tm4c0nK
… contributors. As new events unfold, they will be integrated automatically. The past, already encoded and uploaded as the sum of human knowledge to date.Grokipedia enrages Wikipedia editors.
— Grummz (@Grummz) October 28, 2025
Because Grokipedia does not need authors, and certainly does not need editors. They are out of a job, realizing their high priesthood of truth control is forever gone. They are replaced as of yesterday.
It does not even really need… pic.twitter.com/wzaLMgHhZG
Powered by Grok, who is now the world’s historian, watching and documenting its creators.
… to design it right.Grokipedia isn’t just "updated Wikipedia”, it shows what was wrong, why it was wrong, and what got fixed.
— Thomas Slabbers (@Thomasslabbers) October 28, 2025
Highlight any line, flag it, add context, and Grok reconsiders in real time.
Human judgment with AI could result in the best and most complete source of truth if we continue… pic.twitter.com/eFdJEls3we
No comments:
Post a Comment