Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Nationwide Injunctions

Opposing nationwide injunctions is a bipartisan issue.

The Biden Administration agreed that district courts lack the power to issue nationwide injunctions. Justice Kagan said so too in 2022. In fact, the Executive Branch across the last five presidential administrations has…

— Chad Mizelle (@ChadMizelle47) May 15, 2025

… opposed nationwide injunctions.

The judicial coup cabal's abuse of "universal injunctions" against @RealDonaldTrump and our precious constitutional republic seems to be having trouble gaining majority support at the Supreme Court today.

— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) May 15, 2025

JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS: "So, we survived until the 1960s without universal injunctions?"

SOLICITOR GENERAL JOHN SAUER: "Correct. Those were rare in the 1960s, it exploded in 2007."

It's time to abolish black robe tyranny. pic.twitter.com/0R6b1TDtNB

— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) May 15, 2025

🚨 Justice Amy Coney Barrett grills the Trump admin after they slammed rogue activist judges' national injunctions.pic.twitter.com/dM7fwigdus

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) May 15, 2025

Here's the opening argument by D. John Sauer, U.S. Solicitor General.

This is important to understand the basis of what's being argued. pic.twitter.com/VJCqrmQRUR

— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) May 15, 2025