π You have got to be kidding me.https://t.co/IhhvFvw6DG pic.twitter.com/bnNG4dGSpI
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) March 24, 2025
… have tried to weaponize innocuous actions and turn them into faux outrage that Fake News outlets can use to peddle misinformation.The Atlantic story is nothing more than a section of the NatSec establishment community running the same, tired gameplay from years past.
— Steven Cheung (@StevenCheung47) March 25, 2025
From the “Russia, Russia, Russia” hoax of the first term to the fake documents case of the last four years… at every turn anti-Trump forces…
Don’t let enemies of America get away with these lies.
… Trump officials at the top of the critical silos. The CIA black ops group doesn't like the Trump Ukraine and Trump Russia policy.Let me summarize for those new to the performance.
— TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) March 25, 2025
(1) The CIA special ops group, organized the Signal App operation. That's how Goldberg got in.
(2) Jeffrey Goldberg held the story until the day before the scheduled SSCI hearing.
(3) The SSCI uses the hearing to attack the… pic.twitter.com/qKVijNdQEr
Why? The CIA black ops group doesn't like the Trump Ukraine and Trump Russia policy.
The CIA black ops group doesn't like the Trump Ukraine and Trump Russia policy.
The SSCI [Senate Select Committee on Intelligence] is targeting Trump on behalf of the "seven ways to Sunday group" CIA.
Director Ratcliffe knows the CIA is doing it.
Ratcliffe knows exactly how the Signal app chat was set up.
π¨ HOLY SMOKES.
— johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) March 25, 2025
CIA Director John Radcliffe just confirmed that Signal was loaded into his work devices upon assuming office, and that it was approved as a permissible means of communication.
And people tried to call this “Watergate 2.0” lmao. pic.twitter.com/TaSHJHrEsw
…political activist, a bad combination.This is an important point.
— Miranda Devine (@mirandadevine) March 25, 2025
And now President Trump has told NBC that it was not Waltz but “one of his people” who added Goldberg to the chat.
Goldberg is a sly beat-up merchant (SBUM), a type well-known in the journalism world, more so in the UK. He also is a rabid anti-Trump… https://t.co/YcUZrOWMSB pic.twitter.com/cvYTq7fNXt
There are easy tells in the work product of SBUMS. For instance, the only people Goldberg did not name are likely his sources, “unnamed CIA official” and “unnamed NSC officials”. There may be overlap here just to add a layer of disguise.
Somebody who has Goldberg in his/her phone contacts added him - maybe deliberately, maybe accidentally. It seems absurd that the most destructive, deceptive anti-Trump journalist from the most hostile, sloppy anti-Trump publication could “accidentally” have been added.
There were 150 holdovers from the Biden administration at the NSC when Waltz took over, career staff and detailees from agencies like the CIA, NSA, State Department, and Pentagon. He purged several dozen.
Goldberg’s boss, Kamala buddy and billionaire- by - widowhood, Laurene Jobs, also is a leftist activist most fervent about “immigration” matters.
Only initials. "JG" in this instance
— TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) March 25, 2025
For Jeffrey Goldberg, lying is like breathing. It’s what he does all day, every day.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 25, 2025
Why doesn't Jeffrey Goldberg disclose to readers in his stories that he is a registered Democrat? His wife also worked for Hillary Clinton and has donated nearly $25k to Democrats.
— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) March 25, 2025
Jeffrey Goldberg of the Atlantic, greatest hits:
— πΊπΈππΈπΎπΈ π΅ππππ Ω ♱ (@45LVNancy) March 25, 2025
1. Praised Gen Mark Milley, who admitted he’d warn China if the US attacked them.
2. Russia Collusion
3. Claimed Trump referred to dead military as “suckers and losers”
4. “Good people on both sides”
What’s not to believe pic.twitter.com/PM9H9QXMU6
π¨BREAKING: Jeffrey Goldberg, who lied America into the Iraq War and fabricated the "suckers and losers" hoax, is asked why doesn't he publish more of the Signal chat showing classified information?
— KanekoaTheGreat (@KanekoaTheGreat) March 25, 2025
"No, because they're wrong. *Sigh* ..."https://t.co/piczOw8IqC pic.twitter.com/teFPO3kjHu
Tony Kinnett
I've read the Atlantic article & Signal messages twice, top to bottom. Most of those on social media ringing alarm bells and repeating talking points have not.
Should Goldberg have been added to the chat? No.
Did Goldberg gain access to "secret" information? Kind of. He found out we'd strike the Houthis two hours early.
What Goldberg & the Atlantic are calling TOP SECRET "war plans" is a massive embellishment—any butterbar fresh out of ROTC could tell you that. These aren't war plans. These aren't even school board notes.
They're "Ok, we're ready to do that thing everyone knew we were going to do? Yep? Neat. Also Europe sucks."
Watergate this is not. It's a final, informal check-in after things are already planned/assigned.
No comments:
Post a Comment