Judges Aren’t Allowed

JD is correct about this, and his examples are exactly right. Where the Executive has sole and plenary power under the Constitution--as in commanding military operations or exercising prosecutorial discretion--judges cannot constitutionally interfere. https://t.co/lCRlOTJkZt

— Jed Rubenfeld (@Jed_Rubenfeld) February 10, 2025

Hey Pete, care to show us the line in the Constitution where it says a lone unelected district judge can assume decision-making control over the entire executive branch affecting 300M citizens? Any mention of nationwide district court TROs? Or permanent all-powerful bureaucracy? https://t.co/Su60uSaJk1

— Stephen Miller (@StephenM) February 9, 2025

What if the judicial decision is lawless?

A key component of the constitutional framework is judicial modesty, which is backed up by the fact that the judiciary has nothing to compel obedience, except its credibility.

See, I’m a lawyer too, but the difference, Adam, is that… https://t.co/I7Qd2vXfnq

— Kurt Schlichter (@KurtSchlichter) February 9, 2025

… I’m a good one

Yes, thank God that President Trump was elected to halt the migrant invasion, restore democratic control of the bureaucracy, end communist lawfare and stop the ruthless weaponization of our intelligence and justice systems by the corrupt ruling class. https://t.co/wbylyah71L

— Stephen Miller (@StephenM) February 9, 2025