… subjected to ongoing threats and intimidation for faithfully discharging their duties.Our nation relies on dedicated, selfless public servants every day. They are the lifeblood of our democracy.
— President Biden (@POTUS) January 20, 2025
Yet alarmingly, public servants have been subjected to ongoing threats and intimidation for faithfully discharging their duties.
In certain cases, some have even been…
In certain cases, some have even been threatened with criminal prosecutions, including General Mark A. Milley, Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, and the members and staff of the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol. These public servants have served our nation with honor and distinction and do not deserve to be the targets of unjustified and politically motivated prosecutions.
General Milley served our nation for more than 40 years, serving in multiple command and leadership posts and deploying to some of the most dangerous parts of the world to protect and defend democracy. As Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, he guided our Armed Forces through complex global security threats and strengthened our existing alliances while forging new ones.
For more than half a century, Dr. Fauci served our country. He saved countless lives by managing the government’s response to pressing health crises, including HIV/AIDS, as well as the Ebola and Zika viruses. During his tenure as my Chief Medical Advisor, he helped the country tackle a once-in-a-century pandemic. The United States is safer and healthier because of him.
On January 6, 2021, American democracy was tested when a mob of insurrectionists attacked the Capitol in an attempt to overturn a fair and free election by force and violence. In light of the significance of that day, Congress established the bipartisan Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol to investigate and report upon the facts, circumstances, and causes of the insurrection. The Select Committee fulfilled this mission with integrity and a commitment to discovering the truth. Rather than accept accountability, those who perpetrated the January 6th attack have taken every opportunity to undermine and intimidate those who participated in the Select Committee in an attempt to rewrite history, erase the stain of January 6th for partisan gain, and seek revenge, including by threatening criminal prosecutions.
I believe in the rule of law, and I am optimistic that the strength of our legal institutions will ultimately prevail over politics. But these are exceptional circumstances, and I cannot in good conscience do nothing. Baseless and politically motivated investigations wreak havoc on the lives, safety, and financial security of targeted individuals and their families. Even when individuals have done nothing wrong—and in fact have done the right thing—and will ultimately be exonerated, the mere fact of being investigated or prosecuted can irreparably damage reputations and finances.
That is why I am exercising my authority under the Constitution to pardon General Mark A. Milley, Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, the Members of Congress and staff who served on the Select Committee, and the U.S. Capitol and D.C. Metropolitan police officers who testified before the Select Committee. The issuance of these pardons should not be mistaken as an acknowledgment that any individual engaged in any wrongdoing, nor should acceptance be misconstrued as an admission of guilt for any offense. Our nation owes these public servants a debt of gratitude for their tireless commitment to our country.
December, 2020. Jake Tapper asks President-elect Biden about the rumor that Trump may issue some preemptive pardons before leaving office.
— MAZE (@mazemoore) January 20, 2025
Biden: You're not going to see me do that. π€£ pic.twitter.com/YNyS0Qk9yY
If you ever say “I believe in the rule of law.. BUT” you don’t actually believe in the rule of law.
— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) January 20, 2025
The preemptive pardons... unprecedented? That's the new standard? Presidents can hire people to commit crimes with the promise of a preemptive pardon?
— Jason Whitlock (@WhitlockJason) January 20, 2025
This is how you save democracy?
… preemptive pardons SHOULD be unconstitutional, but they aren't (unless SCOTUS reverses itself).In 1886, the Supreme Court held that the pardon power is “plenary” and can be “exercised either before legal proceedings are taken, or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment.”
— Mike Yoder (@yoder_esq) January 20, 2025
– Ex Parte Garland, 71 U.S. 333, 380 (1866)
I agree with the sentiment that…
… any allegation or threat of criminal investigation or prosecution of me."He doesn’t have to accept the pardon. If he did nothing wrong be a man and turn it down… But you know he won’t because everyone knows he’s guilty of so much. https://t.co/e2QKoHaUPb
— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) January 20, 2025
Dr. Fauci said he is grateful because the threats and possibility of a politically motivated prosecution "creates immeasurable and intolerable distress on me and my family."
— Jonathan Karl (@jonkarl) January 20, 2025
PARDON: Biden has pardoned Michael Byrd for the murder of Ashli Babbitt. The pardon applies to every police officer interviewed by the J6 Committee for ALL crimes committed before, on, or after J6. pic.twitter.com/b4wuZrKeEz
— @amuse (@amuse) January 20, 2025
… corrupted and weaponized the justice system to target their political opponents they know innocence is irrelevant. Pure projection.I would respect someone who received a pardon and turned it down because they know they’re innocent. But Fauci, Kinzinger, Cheney, Milley and all of the J6 Committee will of course accept because either:
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) January 20, 2025
1) They’re guilty as sin and they know it.
OR
2) Democrats have so…
The incoming administration would never use power to convict an innocent person, but either way these disgraceful preemptive pardons will forever mark them all as guilty in the eyes of the public, and either way they’ve brought this terrible legacy on themselves.
…actions of the Select Committee on Jan 6.NEW: Statement to me from Rep. Barry Loudermilk, chairman of House subcommittee investigating Jan 6 and J6 select committee on Biden pardons.
— Julie Kelly πΊπΈ (@julie_kelly2) January 20, 2025
“Clearly these pardons are a direct result of our investigation and exposing the truth of the security failures on Jan 6, 2021 and the…
However, in light of these perceived admissions of wrongdoing, it is imperative that this investigation continue to expose the truth to the American people.”
Gen. Mark Milley in a statement on Biden's preemptive pardon:
— Abby D. Phillip (@abbydphillip) January 20, 2025
"After forty-three years of faithful service in uniform to our Nation, protecting and defending the Constitution, I do not wish to spend whatever remaining time the Lord grants me fighting those who unjustly might…
Wife of Alexander Vindman, the Democrats’ star witness for Trump’s impeachment, says her family wasn’t offered any pardons and she’s very hurt.
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) January 20, 2025
Is there something her family would need a pardon for….? π
The Trump admin should look into this. pic.twitter.com/LfdQ4Zhway
Dear Mrs V, this means they are probably going to throw your husband under the bus. Welcome to the snake pit. You made your bed & now you are going to lie in it. https://t.co/Nz3mWHyaje
— Lara Logan (@laralogan) January 20, 2025
No comments:
Post a Comment