— Julian E. Barnes (@julianbarnes) January 25, 2025
… questions about the possible politicization of this intelligence concerning the origins of COVID.The release of this new CIA assessment about the origin of COVID raises questions about what new evidence has been found to shift the CIA assessment which was written in January after the election and now coincides more with the view of the new director John Ratcliffe, raising… https://t.co/C419hY5es2
— Jennifer Griffin (@JenGriffinFNC) January 25, 2025
Actually it raises questions about why CIA refused to make an assessment all these years.
This also raises the question of why Fox props up a "journalist" [Jennifer Griffin] who does nothing but spout the permanent security state's approved talking points as its Chief NatSec correspondent.
Cliff Sims
You can count on this reporter [Jennifer Griffin] to advance the permanent security state’s propaganda at the expense of objective reporting. Look at her reporting on Austin’s AWOL event, Biden’s handling of the October 7 attack, or Ukraine crisis — always the same. Disappointing.
Ezra A Cohen
LMAO. The CIA paid their investigative analysts to change their assessment away from a lab leak at the time of their initial assessment.
— Jeff Carlson (@themarketswork) January 25, 2025
There is no new evidence. The CIA is just running cover for their own corruption.
… explanation of Covid’s origins and I commend Director Ratcliffe for fulfilling his promise to release this conclusion. Now, the most important thing is to make China pay for unleashing a plague on the world.I’ve said from the beginning that Covid likely originated in the Wuhan labs. Communist China covered it up and the liberal media covered for them. I’m pleased the CIA concluded in the final days of the Biden administration that the lab-leak theory is the most plausible…
— Tom Cotton (@SenTomCotton) January 25, 2025
No comments:
Post a Comment